Popular social networking sites, including MySpace and Facebook,
are changing the human fabric of the Internet and have the
potential to pay off big for investors, but -- given their youthful
user base -- they are unusually vulnerable to the next 'new new'
thing. As quickly as users flock to one trendy Internet site, they
can just as quickly move on to another, with no advance warning,
according to Wharton faculty and Internet analysts.
MySpace, with 70 million visitors, has become the digital
equivalent of hanging out at the mall for today's teens, who load
the site with photos, news about music groups and detailed profiles
of their likes and dislikes. Other social network sites include
Facebook, geared to college students, LinkedIn, aimed at
professionals, and Xanga, a blog-based community site. In all, an
estimated 300 sites, including smaller ones such as StudyBreakers
for high schoolers and Photobucket, a site for posting images, make
up the social network universe.
Wharton marketing professor David Bell
says the long-term success of these sites will depend on their
ability to retain the interest of their members. "There is a fad or
a fashion component to all these networks. Some will come and go,"
says Bell. The classic example, he suggests, is Friendster, which
burst onto the Internet in 2003 and soon had 20 million visitors.
Late last year, it slipped below a million after MySpace and other
sites with better music and video capability lured Friendster users
away. "A lot of the [success] is serendipitous. These things can
have exponential growth. Then, if another community shows up that
has better functionality in some way, there can be a mass
migration."
Wharton marketing professor Peter Fader
agrees that social network sites are powerful, but mercurial,
particularly since most are aimed at teenagers and young adults.
"It's a complete crap shoot. Look how many of these have come along
and how many were touted as the next big thing. How many have
disappeared completely or find themselves in some strange little
unexplainable niche?"
He points to Orkut, an invitation-only service introduced by
Google in 2004 that is little known in the United States, but
wildly popular in Brazil, where more than 70% of its users are
based. Indeed, Orkut has made Portugese a second language in its
interface. "In Brazil it's gold, but in the U.S., where the service
is domiciled, nobody's even heard of Orkut. And there's no good
reason why."
While MySpace and Facebook currently rule the popular crowd on
the Internet social scene, Fader says the forces that make a hot
site are difficult to quantify; any site could become the next
outcast. "There is no reason to believe that these, or future ones
that are emerging on the radar screen, will be any different. I
don't think anyone can come up with a genuine reason why they have
become so popular, outside of 20-20 hindsight." Echoing that point,
an article in the April 30 New York Times reports that AOL
plans to launch a social networking site to be called AIM Pages as
a competitor to MySpace, Yahoo360 and other such services.
One way for investors to benefit from the rise of social
networks would be develop a highly diverse portfolio, Fader adds.
"I have no problem with betting on a crapshoot, but you want to
hedge your bets carefully and accept the downside in exchange for
what could be an incredible upside. You can't control your destiny
with these nearly as much as any other web site or portal."
Next Target: Cell Phones
For the moment, MySpace and Facebook are hot. News Corp. paid
$580 million last year for MySpace as part of a $1.3 billion
Internet acquisition spree. Facebook just received an additional
$25 million in venture capital.
Both companies are planning to extend their reach beyond the
computer screen to cell phones. Cingular Wireless, Sprint Nextel
and Verizon Wireless are starting a service that will allow users
to post messages on Facebook's home pages or search for other
users' phone numbers and email addresses from a cell phone. MySpace
has a pact with Helio, a wireless joint venture between SK Telecom
and Earthlink, that will allow users to send photos and update
their blogs or profiles by cell phone.
According to ComScore Media Metrix, MySpace, with its 70 million
users, ranks second behind Yahoo in pages viewed and time spent on
the site. Facebook, founded by a 21-year-old student on leave from
Harvard and backed by Silicon Valley venture capitalists, has 7.3
million registered users.
Chris Hughes, a spokesperson for Facebook, says the company
thinks of itself more as a directory grounded in real life rather
than a social network creating connections between strangers. "We
model people's real lives at their individual schools in a virtual
space that enables them to exchange information about themselves.
We are not focused on meeting new people, dating or anything like
that. Instead, we want to manage information efficiently so that we
can provide our users the information that matters most to
them."
Social networking sites in general rely mainly on a simple
advertising model -- selling banner and text ads (although they ban
uncool pop up ads). Facebook also permits sponsored groups in which
a marketer can build communities within the site.
BusinessWeek recently reported that Facebook had rejected a
$750 million buyout offer and was holding out for $2 billion. "That
number is nothing but rumor," Hughes says.
When it comes to placing a valuation on the social network
sites, Wharton marketing professor Leonard
Lodish says traditional tools, such as the discounted present
value of the profit stream, apply to these new Internet networks as
much as they do to any other business. He recalls an argument he
had with marketing students during the Internet boom of 2000 about
Internet music seller CDNow. Lodish said the firm would never be
able to justify costs of $70 to attain each customer. The following
year the firm declared bankruptcy.
In the case of MySpace and Facebook, Lodish points out, the cost
of gaining new customers is practically nothing because users join
voluntarily and provide their own content through their profiles.
In addition, the cost of running the sites' web servers is
relatively low. If a classic advertising or subscription revenue
model is used, he says, low-cost social network sites could be
highly profitable.
Yahoo must buy or develop content for its site to attract
advertisers and Google has to invest in its search capabilities,
Lodish notes. "Yahoo makes a lot of money selling ads on its sites.
Why can't Facebook and MySpace do the same thing?"
Nitin Gupta, an analyst with The Yankee Group in Boston, says
MySpace is rooted in linking emerging bands to new fans, which
makes it a logical partner for a media company, such as News Corp.
The company can use the site to test or build buzz around its
products. "These have become almost living systems, as the social
network has begun to expand beyond a place for people with certain
musical tastes and become popular for dating and all sorts of
things."
While the MySpace population has grown, the site's roots remain
in media, Gupta adds. "Today, it continues to be used to identify
individuals interested in, not just music, but television and radio
as well." Before News Corp. bought MySpace, NBC used it to show
clips of "The Office" before the show was aired on the network.
While media companies may be a more logical fit with a social
networking site, other businesses might mesh too, according to
Gupta. "It's a little more difficult to build a community around a
Norelco razor, but it's possible."
Meanwhile, Gupta says, social networks have power beyond ad
revenue to act as a customer relationship management (CRM) tool for
companies selling products or services. "There's a lot of focus on
advertising and banner ads and the amount of traffic. But it's
important to look beyond traditional forms of web adverting to see
the real potential -- which is leveraging the connectivity of the
sites and using them to form communities around products, media or
services to really be in contact with your users."
Still, he acknowledges, it will not be easy to convert those
relationships to new revenue sources. "The future is in finding
ways to monetize the online community beyond just traditional web
advertising, although it's going to be difficult for online
communities, even those behemoths like MySpace."
According to Wharton professor of operations and information
management Eric
K. Clemons, connectivity is nice, but the Internet bust of 2000
showed that revenue is what matters. "As we learned from the first
dot-com silliness, value is not in click-through or eyeballs. Value
comes from revenues .... Can you sell subscriptions to your data or
your service? Can you charge for referrals or for purchases that
result from referrals? Can you sell stuff? If not, your revenue is
zero and your market value is zero."
Safety and Privacy Concerns
As MySpace and other social networking sites have grown, so,
too, have concerns about Internet safety and privacy. The Center
for Missing and Exploited Children reported more than 2,600
incidents of adults using the web to target children online in
order to engage in sexual activity. In March, federal prosecutors
in Connecticut charged two men with using MySpace to contact youths
with whom they later had sexual contact. Following Congressional
hearings about online sexual predators, MySpace hired a safety czar
to improve the site's protections for young users.
The popularity of social networking sites may also have
unexpected consequences for users. A gay student attending a
Christian college was expelled after administration officials
viewed photos of the student in drag on Facebook. Twenty middle
school students in California were suspended after participating in
a MySpace group where one student allegedly threatened to kill
another and made anti-Semitic remarks. In Kansas, authorities
arrested five teenagers after one of the suspects used MySpace to
outline plans for a Columbine-like attack on the boys' school.
Gary Arlen, president of Arlen Communications, a Bethesda, Md.,
research and consulting firm, says MySpace users may also begin to
shy away as they grasp the long-term consequences of putting up
photos of wild parties or tales of sexual bravado. "This stuff may
come back to haunt you 20 years from now. MySpace runs the risk of
a social reaction, but that is part of being the pioneer."
Despite those obstacles, he is enthusiastic about social
networks' promise, although he says the sites' ultimate value is
less clear-cut than other Internet successes, such as eBay and
Amazon. "It may be that this is a very slow play because the
existing sites, Friendster and now MySpace and Facebook, are
building a habit among young users. It will become a part of how
they operate in their 20s and 30s. This service will be part of the
landscape."
According to Bell, there are strategies that social network
sites can use to avoid becoming tomorrow's abandoned property. One
way to retain a site's aura is to limit membership. For example,
Bell notes that when Diesel jeans faced the problem of losing
marketing cachet by becoming too popular, the brand cut back on the
number of outlets it would sell to. Facebook tries to limit itself
to college students. Social networks seem to operate best when they
strike a balance between heterogeneity, which provides large
numbers of members, and selectivity, which keeps the hordes focused
and engaged in the site, he says, adding that social networking
sites also must keep pace with technology and provide new features
-- for example, fast downloads. "To create stickiness you must have
functional value and also community value. If either of those
becomes diluted, you give people a reason to start looking
elsewhere."
As a web-based business, social networks do have some advantages
over traditional companies in tracking user behavior in order to
detect problems early. "If you are sophisticated, you can measure
and monitor the rate at which users join and you can detect early
warning signs, such as a drop off in the number of people
interacting," says Bell. "There would be metrics to monitor if you
are headed in the wrong direction."
Bell also cautions that sites will need to remain subtle in
their approach to marketing if they are to build on their current
success. While they provide banner and text ads, even more valuable
word-of-mouth promotion lurks in the buzz within user profile
pages. "Part of the popularity of these things is that they are
more credible and not explicitly commercial," he says. "If somebody
on the Mac fanatic site tells me about iPod, it's more credible
than Mac advertising. If people feel the networks are too
corporate, that's a turnoff."
Still, no matter how their future takes shape, Bell says these
types of networks are ingrained in Internet society. "They're here
to stay. Like eBay, they are embedded now. The idea of joining
online communities and being able to participate in them is not
going to disappear."